![]() If director Jon Favreau could successfully pull off a live-action remake of "The Jungle Book," that grossed nearly $1 billion, imagine what he can do with "The Lion King." Read more: Who survived and was lost in the Thanos snap "Endgame" will have the advantage of coming out the exact same weekend that "Infinity War" did last year so it has the best shot at having a repeat run at theaters. Last year's "Infinity War" was the first in the franchise to end on a true cliffhanger and you better believe that people want to know how Tony Stark and the remaining heroes are going to reverse the effects of Thanos' life-altering snap. It's whether or not this movie will cross $2 billion or even $2.5 billion.Įvery other "Avengers" movie has crossed $1.4 billion at the box office. Why it could make over $2 billion at the box office: The real question isn't whether or not "Avengers: Endgame" will make $1 billion. "Avengers: Infinity War" box office haul: Over $2 billion You better bet people are going to head to theaters opening weekend so the outcome isn't spoiled for them. Last year's "Avengers" movie ended on one of the biggest pop culture cliffhangers in history. Disney currently holds the previous record with $7.6 billion after its 2016 run with huge performances from " Captain America: Civil War," " Finding Dory," and " Rogue One: A Star Wars Story."įrom "Avengers: Endgame" to another "Star Wars" movie, INSIDER breaks down which movies should bring in at least $1 billion this year for Disney and what hurdles each film may face to reach those record numbers. Only 37 movies have done it in history.īut Disney has so many potential big hits on its hands that the studio could very well break the all-time box-office record for a single movie studio in one year. Crossing $1 billion at the box office isn't easy. With four hugely-anticipated sequels and remakes of three beloved animated classics, at least half of Disney's movies out this year have the potential to gross $1 billion at theaters worldwide. It often indicates a user profile.ĭisney grossed over $7 billion at the box office in 2018, and with an envious lineup again this year, the Mouse House may just make box-office history. Also, on the Intel Mac, typing "file Snapz Pro License" results in a zlib compressed data message.Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. Prior to Ventura, I had successfully activated the license file on the Intel iMac by double clicking it. But, double-clicking on the Intel iMac results in an exec format error. Double-clicking on my M1 Mac activated the Snapz Pro X license with Terminal set to Rosetta. Sorry.) GetInfo says the license file is a Unix Executable File. (Earlier, I had mistakingly shown an image double-clicking the actual app. The file I double click is Snapz Pro X License. ![]() I didn't think it made sense to execute the remaining commands suggested by nohillside because of this error. Here is the Terminal result for running cd. Finder says it is a Unix executable file. Whether I run either zsh or bash, I get the same problem, that the license file is not a directory. ![]() Does anyone have a suggestion how to get this command to work on my iMac? That is the same error I encountered on the Mac Studio before I changed Terminal to Rosetta. Of course, on the Intel iMac, Rosetta is not needed, but double-clicking the bin file results in the output zsh: exec format error. I successfully installed the license this way on the Mac Studio by setting the Terminal app to open in Rosetta. Because Ambrosia SW is no longer in business and has no website, the only way to enter my license code is to run (i.e., double-click) a bin file named Snapz Pro X License that runs a terminal command. I recently upgraded both my M1 Mac Studio and my Intel iMac to Ventura. I still use Snapz Pro as my main screen capture app. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |